20 May 2018

How to make Avengers: Infinity War even better


Avengers: Infinity War is a relatively good movie because of how it managed to fit so many characters into a movie without it being a huge mess. However, if you’ve read the comic, you know it could have been a lot better. I’ve given it a little thought and here’s how I would’ve done things differently.













Warning: This contains spoilers! Only read if you have seen the movie.

When deciding on how to write the story of a movie that is this highly anticipated, you must ask yourself, what is potentially the biggest problem that the movie might face? In the case of Avengers: Infinity War, the answer is clear and simple: there are too many characters which would lead to a lack of focus, crowding out and pacing issues. At the same time, they had to introduce the much anticipated Thanos along with his motivations and backstory and show him getting all 6 Infinity Stones. All of this added together made the film feel a little overcrowded and a little rushed and also draggy in the middle. Therefore, based on everything I know about the comic books and the films, here’s how I would do it differently. It's important, to do this without messing with the ending or any major plot points since they’re clearly building to something bigger in the next Avengers:

The amount of characters in the movie cannot be avoided as the point of the film is to bring every character together. The simplest solution to this problem is to do it how the ‘Infinity Gauntlet’ comic did it: have it be two movies. One called The Thanos Quest, or Guardians of the Galaxy 3: The Thanos Quest, and the other called Avengers: Infinity War. One would focus on the Guardians of the Galaxy and the other focus on the Avengers. This way, the overcrowding issue is solved.

The Thanos Quest

This will focus on the Guardians, specifically Gamora and Nebula and their past with Thanos, as well as Thanos’ hunt for the first 4 Infinity stones (the ones not on Earth). Gamora and Nebula have such an interesting relationship with Thanos and a film where they flashback many times to how he treated them would be great. They could show the scene talked about in previous movies where Thanos would make Gamora and Nebula fight and everytime Gamora won, he would rip out a part of Nebula and replace it with a robotic part. Show how he disciplined and trained them and took care of them. Show how he loved Gamora over Nebula and how Nebula was treated. Just spend time growing these three characters.

More importantly, the 4 Stones. The biggest problem I had with the movie is that Thanos had to get 6 Stones and this made the acquiring of the Stones in the middle of the movie feel like filler. Worst of all, almost every Stone acquisition involved a fight and loads of punching and this started to feel a little repetitive and draggy after a while. Ask yourself this question: Which way of Thanos acquiring an Infinity Stone was the most interesting to watch? Most people will agree that it was the Soul Stone which forced Thanos to give up the one he loved most for it. Why? Because it didn’t involve a fight or punching.  It developed Thanos as a character. He is seen as someone who loves and experiences sadness but is willing to sacrifice his happiness for what he thinks is the greater good. It shows that Thanos truly believes he is doing the right thing and makes his character much more complex. That was a good scene. So that’s what we do. Just like in the comic, every Infinity Stone Thanos collects in this movie will let us learn more about him.

Open the movie the same way as Avengers: Infinity War but with a bit more details. The Asgardians getting decimated, Thanos beating up the Hulk and Heimdall sending Hulk out on the bifrost, all remains in the movie except we don’t show where Hulk is sent to by the bifrost. Being able to beat up the Hulk so easily in hand-to-hand combat shows Thanos is strong and powerful. Everything happens the same way except Thanos doesn’t kill Loki. We can still have the strangulation scene because that made Thanos really terrifying, but Heimdall is the one who gets strangled and killed, not Loki. Loki gives up the Tesseract and offers to help Thanos. He tells him the location of some other Stones, like the one with the Collector and Xandar. Maybe he even warns Thanos when Heimdall tries to stab him in the back which leads to the Heimdall killing. So Loki stays at Thanos’ side as an advisor.

Then we cut to the Guardians and Thor and pretty much the same thing happens as in the film but we really focus on Gamora and Peter. Mantis can help Peter see and feel all the things that Thanos did to Gamora and they can connect better. Gomara tells Peter about who Thanos really is. This is where we see so much of the backstory of Thanos and his motivations and pain growing up. He was teased as a child because he looked different. Maybe show a scene where he didn’t do what he believed was right and someone suffered because of his inaction so he learned he must take action when he believes something is right. Show how he tried to warn his planet’s council about over-population but they laughed him off. Show how he went around the planet planting bombs and murdering people because he believed that was how to save the planet. Show how he is arrested and banished from Titan and how he had to watch as the planet slowly destroyed itself. All these cool things.

The Guardians end up probably splitting up just like the movie and doing their thing, Thor goes off to make his new hammer but we don't see him in this movie again. In the middle of the movie, basically Thanos gets the Power Stone from Xandar in a battle of some sort (since a blockbuster movie needs those). Some of the Guardians, the Ravagers and several other ally planets send forces to help Xandar. Thanos’ army is outnumbered but through some clever tactics, they win the battle and he fights through multitudes of soldiers and takes the Stone. This shows his ability in strategy and battle. He gets his army to shoot and kill half of the population of Xandar the same way he does to Gamora’s world. But we don’t see it. It cuts right when he gives the order and we hear some screaming as the camera zooms into his face. Obviously, the Guardians escape somehow. Maybe Loki convinces Thanos to spare them because he claims Thanos will need them to get the other Stones.

Then they can put more backstory and possibly Thanos’ relationship with Nebula in as she tries to ambush Thanos. They can also have the Guardians regrouping and really discouraged. Gamora gives them a pep talk and encourages them that Thanos still hasn't gained all the Stones yet. Really have a spotlight on her in this film. Then she goes to the back and cries. Peter talks to her and they have the same conversation as in Avengers: Infinity War where she asks him to kill her if she is caught by Thanos.

Thanos vs The GrandMaster
Then Thanos goes for the Reality Stone from the Collector in a convoluted battle of wits where he manages to outsmart a really clever AI in the Collector’s collection or something (since the GrandMaster in this universe isn’t a genius tactician). This will show that Thanos is not just muscle but really, really smart. After he obtains it, we have the same scene as in the movie where he fakes out Gamora and she asks Peter to kill her but this time it’s even more heart wrenching because of the emotional connection they’ve had throughout the film. He's the first one she's told all of these things to. Then, exactly the same thing where Thanos uses Nebula to force Gamora to tell him where the Soul Stone is, except have him bring Nebula with him and Gamora to Vormir cause that makes sense since he’s using her as leverage. Nebula will still be incapacitated though. Same scene plays out. Peter maybe finds something in Gamora's things that hints to him to go to Vormir too. The children of Thanos are guarding the hill while Thanos, Gamora, Nebula and Loki go up and the Guardians will be trying to fight  their way through. Then, at the ending climax of the film, Thanos tears up and sacrifices Gamora the same way but this time with Nebula watching but not being able to do anything. Bright light and Thanos gets up with the Stone in his hand but still on the mountain. He says he’ll spare Nebula because that’s what ‘she’ would have wanted and he can maybe have a powerful and emotional speech about this being bigger than anyone of them while having tears in his eyes. Loki who has followed them up the mountain looks on in fear. Peter, fights through and is climbing up the mountain as the other Guardians hold off the children of Thanos when he sees Gamora plummeting to her death. He goes crazy and starts running at Thanos trying to shoot him. But Thanos uses the Space Stone to teleport away. Sadness all around. Nebula gets up and picks up the dagger that Gamora tried to use to kill Thanos. Peter cries over Gamora saying, “Please, not you too,” as he hugs her and the Guardians all gather around him. Give the audience time to feel the emotions and then have the ending scene.


Thanos’ face with wet eyes. Someone appears from the background behind him and asking, “Sir, what do we do next?” Thanos wipes a tear from his eye, turns around, looks at the gauntlet and says, “Four down, two to go.” He lifts his head up and looks outside the windscreen of his ship as it heads to the Earth. End.

Post-credits scene: Earth with Dr Strange. The Bifrost sends Hulk crashing into Dr Strange’s place. Banner wakes up and says, “Thanos… Thanos is coming.” Cuts to black.

Avengers: Infinity War
This is where we focus on the Avengers. We can still have the Guardians come by but not much focus on them as they’ve already been the focus of the last movie. The main focus of the film is the relationship between Vision and Scarlet Witch because we know that is the core conflict and climax of the movie. Have much longer scenes to develop their relationship and struggles and how important Vision is to Wanda. Then when she does what she does at the end, it would be more emotional. We can basically still have the same scenes in the movie happen but this time there will be much more time for each scene since we’ve gotten Thanos’ backstory and 4 Stones out of the way. The ending is pretty much the same
because it was great, but Thor doesn’t throw the Stormbreaker through Thanos right after he assembles the whole gauntlet. Instead, Thor attacks Thanos along with every other Avenger before Thanos gets to Vision but is brushed off like the rest. Maybe Thanos makes a portal in front of him when Thor throws the Stormbreaker at him and it goes through the portal behind Thanos or something. Then instead of Thor attacking Thanos at the very end before the finger snap, it’s Loki who does it. Loki follows Thanos throughout the whole
Bring his redemption arc full circle
by having him stab Thanos
the way he stabbed Coulson.
process giving him advice and at the very end, he stabs Thanos in the back with Corvus Glaive's bladed staff right after he assembles the Gauntlet. Loki can say something cool and self-reflecting like, "You will never be a god." Then Thanos says his line ‘you should have gone for the head’. Thanos can either kill Loki there and then or Loki can disappear with the rest while Thor looks on. Also, during the disappearing scenes, I would add some scenes of normal people disappearing along with the heroes. That would be more terrifying and emotional. Maybe even have a little child looking for her mother. But that may be a little too far for Marvel and Disney to do. And then it ends the exact same way with Thanos in that field because that was great.

And that’s pretty much it. Story remains intact, plot lines all pretty much happen the same way but scenes are allowed to breathe and you get a whole other movie out of it, which would be very profitable.

25 March 2016

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

When the world questions the potential threat of an all-powerful Superman, a figure rises from the shadows and rubble of the chaos created during the battle in Metropolis. Bruce Wayne believes that leaving the absolute power of Superman unchecked will only lead to the destruction of mankind. So, using his own unchecked power and dawning his own cape and mask, he sets out to take on the Man of Steel. With the two superheroes so focused on one another, a new potential threat arises in the form of the Joker Lex Luthor who wants the two to fight for some reason.



Before I begin, I want to establish a few things. Number one, I am not a ‘Marvel Fan Boy’. Only people who do not read comics think that they have to choose sides. We live in a world where we can enjoy both sets of comics and both sets of characters and I love them all. Superman is my second favourite comic book character of all time, just behind Spider-Man. The Joker is my favourite villain in all media. Batman’s dynamic with the Joker and many of his other villains is what I consider the best in all of comics and possibly even movies. I have read so many graphic novels of the two characters, played the Arkham games and love both of these characters to bits. That is why it hurts all the more when someone who clearly does not understand the essence of Superman is asked to make a multi-million dollar film for Superman called Man of Steel and then, after doing such a bad job at it, is asked to come back to make another movie of Superman fighting Batman.

"At least it can't get any worse"
Sitting at a rating of 31% on Rotten Tomatoes, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is a huge waste of potential. There were clearly some very good ideas that Zack Snyder had for the film that I could have loved. Unfortunately, it was badly executed and paced. With so many storylines going on at the same time, the scenes just didn’t seem to connect with each other. It was better than Man of Steel, but that really is not saying much. By the way, although it is supposedly PG-13, this is not a film for kids. To make things easier, I’ll split up the review to positives and negatives about the film and also add in things I felt where just…‘meh’. Don’t worry, I won’t spoil anything that isn’t already in the trailers.

Positives:
      1)    Ben Affleck
That awkward moment when you are
a better director than the person
that is directing you.
Ben Affleck did a good job playing Bruce Wayne. One problem I had with Christian Bale’s performance was that although he was quite a good Batman, he doesn’t really portray Bruce Wayne well. When Affleck was first cast, I thought it was a horrible decision. However, he has proven me wrong and I really enjoyed his performance. He may, in fact, be my favourite Bruce Wayne on film. As for him playing Batman, it is quite difficult to determine. Batman in full costume doesn’t really appear a lot in the film but I do have hopes for his upcoming films. Batman’s fighting style was also filmed very well. The problems I had with Batman are not Affleck’s fault and therefore cannot be attributed to him.

      2)    Opening Credits & First 20 minutes
The opening credits of the film caught me by surprise. It was Zack Snyder at his best, using visuals to tell a story. In fact, it was very much reminiscent of the opening credits in Watchmen. It hooked me in straight away and the first 20 minutes of the film really felt like a foundation for a strong film. But come to think of it, so did the first 20 minutes of Man of Steel.

      3)    Addressing some problems in Man of Steel
The main plot of the story involves addressing the problem most people had with Man of Steel, which is that Superman pretty much destroyed the whole of Metropolis and Smallville. The scene with the senate hearing shown in the trailers was very good. Although they clearly did not make that first film with the intention to address it in this way in the sequel, DC was willing to listen to its fans and tried to fix the problem by addressing this issue. Props to DC for that.

      4)    The build up to the fight
The fight was coming. Everyone knew that. We just didn’t know when it would happen and the film did a relatively good job of building it up.

5)   Superman saving people
There was only one short montage in the film where Superman actually saved people. That was good.


Meh:
      1)    Wonder Woman
I know Wonder Woman is being praised a lot in other reviews but I have a feeling that that is because we all just wanted to see Wonder Woman on the big screen so much that we were willing to accept any iteration of her. First of all, I don’t think Wonder Woman was well casted. Gal Gadot just played ‘the woman’ in the film until it was time to put on the costume. In her defense, however, she had very little screen time and the very few scenes that she had in combat were done relatively well. As to what her character’s role is in the grand scheme of things remains to be seen.

      2)    Alfred
Jeremy Irons did a pretty good job playing Alfred in the film. Unfortunately for him, he was following Michael Caine who, in my opinion, was one of the best Alfreds we ever got on film. Irons was alright. That’s about it.


Negatives:
      1)    Lack of respect for the characters
Yet again, Snyder shows that he is either ignorant of or has no respect for the original characters in the comics. Relegating Superman to a thug that always frowns for the first half of the film, turning Lex Luthor into a Joker-wannabe, having Ma Kent advice Clark to just forget about this world and making Diana Prince act like Selina Kyle are just some of the atrocities he and his writers commit. Remember when people were saying Superman will have learnt his lesson about killing people in the last movie? Nope. He doesn't. He still throws normal human beings through like three walls at full Superman speed. Oh ya, and apparently, Batman kills low-level henchmen now. That kind of sums it up perfectly.

      2)    Lex Luthor
"Hey guys, let's make Lex as different
from his comic book counterpart as
possible...starting with the hair!"
He gets his own category. Lex Luthor is one of the most iconic villains in DC comics. He is a smart and arrogant man who is constantly concerned about how he looks, charming people to thinking he is good and always claiming to do what he does for the good of mankind. What he is not is the Joker. He doesn’t talk in weird ways and cryptically tell people things and act creepily with women. The iteration of Lex Luthor in this film is one of the worst changes of an iconic comic book character that I have ever seen on film. In the film, Lex did not seem to have a solid reason for doing most of the things he did. He didn’t seem like he was trying to help out mankind. He just wants Superman to die and the two heroes to fight. It’s all just about chaos. He just shows up and creeps people out.  Sound familiar? Because that’s supposed to be the Joker. This misrepresentation of Lex Luthor can be attributed to both the misunderstanding of the characters by the writers and the acting of Jesse Eisenberg who seems to only be able to play the same character in all his movies. Together, they made the most cringe-worthy and horrible excuse for a comic book character in a film I have seen since Deadpool in X-Men Origins: Wolverine. And the last scene with Lex was just so embarrassing. Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor is without a doubt the worst part of the movie.

      3)    Character motivations
Lex Luthor was pretty much that
Jimmy Kimmel character.
The importance of what is happening on screen can only be felt if the characters have motivations that make sense to the audience. In other words, Batman and Superman need to have a good reason to fight. Otherwise, it’ll leave the audience feeling like the fight is unnecessary. Unfortunately for the film, that is exactly how the fight between Batman and Superman felt. A lot of the fighting was completely unnecessary and we as the audience just felt like if the heroes would just open their mouths and say three words to each other, they wouldn’t have to fight. This causes the audience to be disconnected from the fight and not really care about it. Another example is found in that famous scene in the trailer when Lex goes up to Bruce and Clark talking and says, “Bruce Wayne meets Clark Kent” like it was a big deal when in the logic of the movie, Clark Kent is a nobody reporter. So it shouldn’t be a big deal at all. The lack of proper character motivation is shown most in a scene in which Lois Lane, for no apparent reason, drops something into some water. It shows that the writers and director put no thought into the motivations of their characters and just had them do things so they could progress the story. That is lazy writing, and on a multi-million dollar movie, that should not be acceptable.

      4)    Score/ Soundtrack
Hans Zimmer is responsible for some of the greatest and most iconic soundtracks in recent memory. In fact, his soundtrack is sometimes the only positive thing audiences can take from the films he is involved in. I do not understand what happened to him in this film however. I’m not a person who ever notices the score of a film but even I noticed this one. And that isn’t a good thing. The score sounded messy and overly dramatic at times where the film was not trying to be. The music kind of clashed with each other and felt very unnatural. I understand that every character needs to have their own character theme but it was so blatant and they just didn’t blend well with each other. Lex Luthor’s theme was clearly very Joker-ish and kind of silly. And don’t even get me started on Wonder Woman’s jungle theme and how it clashes with everything. Not a good score by Hans Zimmer this time and that is amplified by how badly it was used in the context of the film. I hope this is just a one-off thing for him.

      5)    Pacing and Arrangement of Scenes
These two things usually go unnoticed by most filmgoers but they are so important to the overall ‘feel’ of the film. Many critics called the film a mess and that is very true. That is mainly because of the lack of proper pacing and the mismanagement of the arrangement of the scenes. Scenes that happened back to back never seemed to relate to one another and seemed just randomly thrown together so the audience would not forget what a character is doing. Kind of like some TV shows. It also doesn’t help that there were so many storylines and character arcs going on at the same time. Lois Lane’s, Wonder Woman’s and the Daily Planet’s story arcs felt completely unnecessary in the grand scheme of things and could have been cut from the film completely.


If you think this was a huge change
from the comic, you haven't seen
anything yet.
Ultimately, the whole film can be summed up in what I said at the start. A waste of potential. I do think that it deserves more than the 31% rating on Rotten Tomatoes but that still doesn’t say a lot. They had some great ideas but wasted it on creative talents who have no respect for the source material. Don’t even get me started on what a waste Doomsday was. DC has a whole set of films coming out and as much as I’d like them to change the overall theme of their films, I know it will not happen. Therefore, I have a different suggestion for the producers at DC: get rid of Zack Snyder and David Goyer and bring in someone who actually cares about these characters that your company owns. We are, after all, talking about the same two guys that thought it would be too lame to call the Kal-El character, “Superman” in the Man of Steel movie. They are the same two guys who are defending their decision to have Batman take out a machine gun and shoot at low-level henchmen in this movie. These two guys have no respect for the source material; they only care about how ‘cool’ things will look on screen. There is a lot of talent out there that would be capable of doing so much more for these characters. Just get someone who actually loves these characters that, in all honesty, have much more potential than the characters in Marvel.

I wish I could say that I can see a possibility of greatness for the future DC films, but Man of Steel combined with Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice really does not give me a lot to hope for. Don’t even get me started on ‘gangster Joker’ in that Suicide Squad movie that looks like it’s heading down the same path as its predecessors. I didn’t hate Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice but I didn’t like it either. But I do really hope to see a movie one day where Superman is actually a good guy and a hero instead of a person that’s angry with the world and pretty much hates people that aren’t his family or Lois. Or does Zack Snyder think that’s too lame for modern cinema?

After Credits Movie Rating: 5.5/10


 
[Warning: Spoilers ahead]

The ending. First of all, it was waaaayy too soon for it to happen. It should have happened in the second or third Justice League movie when Superman has been established as a beloved character to the people. But no… DC HAD to put up something to beat out Marvel's Civil War. They HAD to kill someone off. The ‘Death of Superman’ story arc is one of the most iconic Superman storylines ever. And Zack Snyder decided to waste it on the last 30 minutes of a film where Superman shares half his screen time with Batman. And it was hardly even sad at all since everyone already knows that he is coming back for the Justice League. In fact, they teased him coming back about 10 minutes after he died. This film is the first time the general audience will experience the important death of this character and the film wasted it with a misunderstanding of why the death was so significant and sad. Superman is supposed to die as an ultimate sacrifice because there was no other options that could kill Doomsday after the Justice League had failed. It was supposed to symbolise his relationship with his city and his love for the people. But in this film, the people hated him and he seemed to hate the people. The only person Superman seemed to love is Lois and his mother. And that final scene seem to only show his love for Lois since they were fighting in an empty area where no one else would actually get hurt. Also, the three superheroes seemed to be handling Doomsday quite fine. I know that they tried to nuke him and they said a thousand times that he was indestructible, but the audience didn’t feel that. In fact, they were only fighting for like 15 minutes. It didn’t feel like a last ditch effort and a necessary sacrifice. It felt unearned and wasted. Yes, they can always redo the death of Superman again on film, but it will never be as impactful as the first time the general audience saw it. Again, a waste of potential.